the summary of the new.

The new I have elected is: “Are flashy upgrades really more fun than the classics?”
Passing this text I’m going to say why this new is related whit the anthropology, my career.
First, this new starts whit the writer saying that if the games according to the improve of their special effects, the graphics, It will be better than one whit less improvement in that parts. Then, looking in all senses, the reporter ask if not only the games will be better whit more graphics, besides he ask about the movies. He says no, he don’t thinks that. The quality of one thing depends on the kind of game, in the way how it has to be played.
Now the anthropology can start to be useful, the opinion of the reporter has no support, he have to do interviews and investigations more serious than talk about his experience. So the anthropologist can search about the real things. Because we can think that the game when gets a improve in the graphic, it’s better than the others: according whit the sensations and visual things the feeling of the player can be more real than in other game, and the game will be better.
So, the anthropologist have to do interviews and investigations to make a good asseveration.